Broad Spectrum Revolution Giving Up the Paleo Diet

The Broad Spectrum Revolution (abbreviated BSR and sometimes referred to as niche broadening) refers to a human subsistence shift at the end of the last Ice Age (ca 20,000–8,000 years ago). During the Upper Paleolithic (UP), people all over the globe survived on diets made up primarily of the meat from large-bodied terrestrial mammals—the first paleo diet. But at some point after the Last Glacial Maximum, their descendants broadened their subsistence strategies to include hunting small animals and foraging for plants, becoming hunter-gatherers. Eventually, humans began  domesticating those plants and animals, in the process radically changing our way of life. Archaeologists have been trying to figure out the mechanisms that made those changes happen since the early decades of the 20th century. Braidwood to Binford to Flannery The term Broad Spectrum Revolution was coined  in 1969  by archaeologist Kent Flannery, who created the idea to get a better understanding of how humans changed from Upper Paleolithic hunters to Neolithic farmers in the Near East. Of course, the idea didnt come out of thin air: BSR was developed as a response to Lewis Binfords theory about why that change happened, and Binfords theory was a response to Robert Braidwood. In the early 1960s, Braidwood suggested that agriculture was the product of experimentation with wild resources in optimal environments (the hilly flanks theory): but he didnt include a mechanism that explained why people would do that. In 1968, Binford argued that such changes could only be forced by something that disrupted the existing equilibrium between resources and technology—big mammal hunting technologies worked in the UP for tens of thousands of years. Binford suggested that disruptive element was climate change—the rise in sea level at the end of the Pleistocene reduced the overall land available to populations and forced them to find new strategies. Braidwood himself was responding to V.G. Childes Oasis Theory: and the changes werent linear. Many of scholars were working this problem, in all of the ways typical of the messy, exhilarating process of theoretical change in archaeology. Flannerys Marginal Areas and Population Growth In 1969, Flannery was working in the Near East in the Zagros mountains far from the impacts of sea level rises, and that mechanism wasnt going to work well for that region. Instead, he proposed that hunters began to use invertebrates, fish, waterfowl, and plant resources as a response to localized population density. Flannery argued that, given a choice, people live in optimal habitats, the best places for whatever their subsistence strategy happens to be; but by the end of the Pleistocene, those locations had become too crowded for hunting big mammals to work. Daughter groups budded off and moved into areas that were not so optimal, so-called marginal areas. The old subsistence methods wouldnt work in these marginal areas, and instead, people began exploiting an increasing array of small game species and plants. Putting the People Back In The real problem with BSR, though, is what created Flannerys notion in the first place—that environments and conditions are different across time and space. The world of 15,000 years ago, not unlike today, was made up of a wide variety of environments, with different amounts of patchy resources and different levels of plant and animal scarcity and abundance. Societies were structured with different gender and societal organizations and used different levels of mobility and intensification. Diversifying resource bases–and particularizing again to exploit a select number of resources–are strategies used by societies in all of these places. With the application of new theoretical models such as the niche construction theory (NCT), archaeologists today define the specific shortcomings within a specific environment (niche) and identify the adaptations that humans used to survive there, whether they are expanding the dietary breadth of their resource base or contracting it. Using a comprehensive study known as human behavioral ecology, researchers recognize that human subsistence is a nearly continuous process of coping with changes in resource base, whether people are adapting to environmental changes in the region where they live, or moving away from that region and adapting to new situations in new locations. Environmental manipulation of the environment occurred and occurs in zones with optimal resources and those with less optimal ones, and the use of BSR/NCT theories allows the archaeologist to measure those characteristics and gain an understanding of what decisions were made and whether they were successful— or not. Sources Abbo, Shahal, et al. Wild Lentil and Chickpea Harvest in Israel: Bearing on the Origins of Near Eastern Farming. Journal of Archaeological Science 35.12 (2008): 3172-77. Print.Allaby, Robin G., Dorian Q. Fuller, and Terence A. Brown. The Genetic Expectations of a Protracted Model for the Origins of Domesticated Crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.37 (2008): 13982–86. Print.Binford, Lewis R. Post-Pleistocene Adaptations. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Eds. Binford, Sally R., and Lewis R. Binford. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine, 1968. 313–41. Print.Ellis, Erle C., et al. Evolving the Anthropocene: Linking Multi-Level Selection with Long-Term Social–Ecological Change. Sustainability Science 13.1 (2018): 119–28. Print.Flannery, Kent V. Origins and Ecological Effects of Early Domestication in Iran and the Near East. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. Eds. Ucko, Peter J. and George W. Dimbleby. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. 73 –100. Print.Gremillion, Kristen, Loukas Barton, and Dolores R. Piperno. Particularlism and the Retreat from Theory in the Archaeology of Agricultural Origins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition (2014). Print.Guan, Ying, et al. Modern Human Behaviors During the Late Stage of the MIS3 and the Broad Spectrum Revolution: Evidence from a Shuidonggou Late Paleolithic Site. Chinese Science Bulletin 57.4 (2012): 379–86. Print.Larson, Greger, and Dorian Q. Fuller. The Evolution of Animal Domestication. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45.1 (2014): 115–36. Print.Piperno, Dolores R. Assessing Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis for Plant Domestication and Agricultural Origin Research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114.25 (2017): 6429–37. Print.Rillardon, Maryline, and Jean-Philip Brugal. What About the Broad Spectrum Revolution? Subsistence Strategy of Hunter–Gatherers in Southeast Fr ance between 20 and 8  KA BP. Quaternary International 337 (2014): 129–53. Print.Rosen, Arlene M., and Isabel Rivera-Collazo. Climate Change, Adaptive Cycles, and the Persistence of Foraging Economies During the Late Pleistocene/Holocene Transition in the Levant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109.10 (2012): 3640–45. Print.Stiner, Mary C. Thirty Years on the Broad Spectrum Revolution and Paleolithic Demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98.13 (2001): 6993–96. Print.Stiner, Mary C., et al. A Forager–Herder Trade-Off, from Broad-Spectrum Hunting to Sheep Management at Asikli Hà ¶yà ¼k, Turkey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111.23 (2014): 8404–09. Print.Zeder, Melinda A. The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource Diversity, Intensification, and an Alternative to Optimal Foraging Explanations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31.3 (2012): 241–64. Print.---. Core Questions in D omestication Research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.11 (2015): 3191–98. Print.